Welcome to the WRR/X Forum
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.
Welcome to the WRR/X Forum

A place to share your passion for the WR250R/X!
 
HomeHome  Latest imagesLatest images  SearchSearch  RegisterRegister  Log inLog in  
WR250R/X Forum

 

 WR290R VS KLX350S Comparison

Go down 
+5
oic0
motokid
rahiminia
wristpin
GunMetal87
9 posters
AuthorMessage
GunMetal87





WR290R VS KLX350S Comparison Empty
PostSubject: WR290R VS KLX350S Comparison   WR290R VS KLX350S Comparison EmptyThu May 17, 2012 8:18 pm

Newbie here looking to buy my first bike this year.

Has anyone done a comparison of the wr250r and the klx250s with their big bore kits installed?

I'm most likely getting a WRR, it puts a bigger smile on my face when I see one on the road, but the price tag does not.
I'll be mostly off-roading, lots of forest riding here in WA then random trips to Oregon Dunes and Moab Utah - with a trailer.
Then some random 20-30 min rides on the road and 15 min commute to work when the weather is nice.

I appreciate any input, thanks!

Back to top Go down
wristpin





WR290R VS KLX350S Comparison Empty
PostSubject: Re: WR290R VS KLX350S Comparison   WR290R VS KLX350S Comparison EmptyThu May 17, 2012 8:36 pm

My buddy has a KLR250s and it is a hell of a good bike, I can't tell much of a difference between that and my stock WR as far as power, weight, handling, etc. With a pipe and carb mods it's almost the same as a stock WR. It does not require much additional maintenance either. I would buy one if money was tight and I wanted a good bike. The WR is a better looking bike though, and I feel it has a better overall reliability factor. If you have enough cash to put a big bore kit on a KLX it may be better spent on a WR in my opinion.
Back to top Go down
rahiminia





WR290R VS KLX350S Comparison Empty
PostSubject: Re: WR290R VS KLX350S Comparison   WR290R VS KLX350S Comparison EmptyThu May 17, 2012 9:08 pm

mate just get the wr250r you wont regret it =) (specially if your mostly offroading)
Back to top Go down
motokid
Moderator
motokid



WR290R VS KLX350S Comparison Empty
PostSubject: Re: WR290R VS KLX350S Comparison   WR290R VS KLX350S Comparison EmptyFri May 18, 2012 5:45 am

Why are you automatically thinking big-bored versions of these bikes?

_________________
2008 WR250X
Gearing: 13t - 48t
Power Commander 5 / PC-V
Airbox Door Removed - Flapper glued - AIS removed
FmF Q4
Bridgestone Battlax BT-003rs
Back to top Go down
oic0

oic0



WR290R VS KLX350S Comparison Empty
PostSubject: Re: WR290R VS KLX350S Comparison   WR290R VS KLX350S Comparison EmptyFri May 18, 2012 11:02 am

From what I've read, the big bore KLX is about equal to a piped open airbox WR250 in terms of pure hp but has a lot more low end grunt.
Back to top Go down
mucker

mucker



WR290R VS KLX350S Comparison Empty
PostSubject: Re: WR290R VS KLX350S Comparison   WR290R VS KLX350S Comparison EmptyFri May 18, 2012 2:39 pm

All I know is when they were side by each, at the bike show...the hole in the KLX tailpipe was puny compared to the R2...don't think I could fit my pinky in there.
KLX didn't really look bad at all... 'cept when next to the R2.
Back to top Go down
GunMetal87





WR290R VS KLX350S Comparison Empty
PostSubject: Re: WR290R VS KLX350S Comparison   WR290R VS KLX350S Comparison EmptyFri May 18, 2012 5:10 pm

Thanks for the feedback everyone! good info.

@motokid, I know stock the wr250r will be plenty of power for my off-road needs but I would also eventually like to be able to slap on some supermoto wheels/tires and cruise comfortably at 70-75mph without feeling like I'm maxing out the throttle.

I have seen some mixed responses on other forums about how these bikes handle at higher speeds?
Back to top Go down
motokid
Moderator
motokid



WR290R VS KLX350S Comparison Empty
PostSubject: Re: WR290R VS KLX350S Comparison   WR290R VS KLX350S Comparison EmptyFri May 18, 2012 5:44 pm

GunMetal87 wrote:
Thanks for the feedback everyone! good info.

@motokid, I know stock the wr250r will be plenty of power for my off-road needs but I would also eventually like to be able to slap on some supermoto wheels/tires and cruise comfortably at 70-75mph without feeling like I'm maxing out the throttle.

I have seen some mixed responses on other forums about how these bikes handle at higher speeds?

Slightly modded wr250x will easily go 75mph for many hours.

A big-bore might actually be harder on bike than a modded stock engine.

_________________
2008 WR250X
Gearing: 13t - 48t
Power Commander 5 / PC-V
Airbox Door Removed - Flapper glued - AIS removed
FmF Q4
Bridgestone Battlax BT-003rs
Back to top Go down
mucker

mucker



WR290R VS KLX350S Comparison Empty
PostSubject: Re: WR290R VS KLX350S Comparison   WR290R VS KLX350S Comparison EmptyFri May 18, 2012 5:47 pm

It's kinda hard to imagine any small bike handling higher road speeds...but my bike is more than willing to go wherever I choose. And its a dirt bike...heh.
It has gotta be one of The best dual sports, easily.
Back to top Go down
Gany





WR290R VS KLX350S Comparison Empty
PostSubject: Re: WR290R VS KLX350S Comparison   WR290R VS KLX350S Comparison EmptyFri May 18, 2012 7:26 pm

I had a KLX with 331 big bore. I now have a WR250X. Power/torque is different. The KLX with big bore pulled better lower down and had that little more grunt for highway riding. The WR250X is stock. Stock its much better than the stock KLX. You need to rev the motor more with the WR stock but it probably has more power stock the big bore KLX but less torque.

A little more torque with the WR would be nice but not sure a big bore kit is worth the money (probably better off changing sprockets than the expense of big bore).

After big boring the KLX, it was much better, but expensive and the fuel consumption was much higher. Not sure it was worth it in the end, hence I have held off big boring the WR.
Back to top Go down
josh





WR290R VS KLX350S Comparison Empty
PostSubject: Re: WR290R VS KLX350S Comparison   WR290R VS KLX350S Comparison EmptySun May 20, 2012 5:15 pm

I had a red 08 KLX250s. I modded the heck out of it short of the big bore. Handled highway with easy and was very comfortable but sold it because of the stalling issue.....drove me crazy. The WR250 is everything the KLX was plus the ease of fuel injected. Hands down WR is the way to go. 90 percent of my riding is highway commute at 70mph no problem. The rest of the time it's a little dirty....again no problem. Good luck with your choice.
Back to top Go down
nosweat

nosweat



WR290R VS KLX350S Comparison Empty
PostSubject: Re: WR290R VS KLX350S Comparison   WR290R VS KLX350S Comparison EmptyMon May 21, 2012 9:34 pm

Hello, owned a stock 06 KLX250 and a modded 09 KLX250,plus a 08 WR250x stock, and now a 08 WR290R with most the basic mods and a Dynojet PC V. I have 12 43 in it but heading to 13 49. I really enjoy the bike and it's power, just enough power for me. Probbably a rear shock revalve next season.

thumb
Back to top Go down
Sponsored content





WR290R VS KLX350S Comparison Empty
PostSubject: Re: WR290R VS KLX350S Comparison   WR290R VS KLX350S Comparison Empty

Back to top Go down
 
WR290R VS KLX350S Comparison
Back to top 
Page 1 of 1
 Similar topics
-
» My Full WR250X review. ALL POTENTIAL WRX BUYERS READ THIS
» Anybody "graduate" from a TW to the WR?
» Getting a new slip on- comparison question
» FMF Q4/Stock muffler Comparison
» IMS 3 gallon fit issue. Need comparison.

Permissions in this forum:You cannot reply to topics in this forum
Welcome to the WRR/X Forum :: General :: WRR/X General Discussion-
Jump to: